by John Cylc

August 21, 2024

The notion of a second American Civil War, a topic recently explored in various media outlets, has captured considerable attention and debate. Following a major film release earlier this year and discussions in multiple podcasts, this issue has sparked widespread speculation about the likelihood and nature of such a conflict. In contemplating this scenario, my reflections have shifted towards a discussion on the potential outcomes of a hypothetical internal conflict and how the prevailing side might shape the future of the nation.

To begin with, it is important to clarify my stance: I do not believe that the United States is on the verge of another Civil War. The term “Civil War” traditionally implies a conflict between two distinct factions within the same country, each vying for dominance over the other. However, based on current socio-political trends, it appears that the nation might be heading towards a situation more akin to a Revolutionary War. In this scenario, citizens might rise against a government perceived as increasingly oppressive and detached from the principles of democracy and individual freedoms. This perspective aligns with a viewpoint I previously expressed in response to discussions on Rush Limbaugh’s radio program.

This article aims to explore not the tactical aspects or alliances that might characterize such a conflict, but rather the potential consequences for the nation post-conflict and how the victors might govern. I will differentiate between two ideological groups for the sake of this discussion: those aligned with conservative, republican, or constitutionalist principles, whom I will refer to as the “Right,” and those with liberal, progressive, or socialist viewpoints, whom I will refer to as the “Left.”

If the Right Should Win the Civil War

Should the Right emerge victorious, the governance of the newly established nation would likely reflect their core beliefs and principles. This version of America would emphasize national loyalty and a strict adherence to the Constitution. Individual autonomy would be a cornerstone, with personal responsibility being paramount. Citizens would be free to act within legal boundaries without excessive government interference. The notion of self-reliance would be central, with minimal safety nets for those unwilling to engage in productive activities. However, this does not mean that support for those in genuine need would be absent. The Right’s approach to welfare would be more conditional, focusing on aiding individuals who are not simply seeking to avoid responsibility.

Government structure under this regime would be characterized by its minimalism. The primary function of the Constitution would be reconfirmed to limit governmental power rather than individual freedom, which is how the current liberals portray that sacred document. This would entail a reduction in government size and a relaxation of regulations, thus fostering greater personal freedom. Educational institutions would prioritize fundamental subjects such as sciences, history, mathematics, and literacy, while extracurricular programs and ideological indoctrination would be minimized and removed respectively.

The military would maintain a state of high readiness, with rigorous training standards that are applied uniformly across all personnel, irrespective of age or gender. This would be a departure from the current emphasis on social justice and inclusivity in training standards that weaken or leave our forces unprepared for actual combat.

If the Left Should Win the Civil War

If the Left were to prevail, the nation would likely experience a substantial increase in government size and regulatory oversight. Corporate operations would be heavily regulated to align with ideological goals. Freedom of speech could be curtailed to conform with approved ideological perspectives, with increased monitoring of social media to suppress dissenting views. Educational agenda would increase its current emphasis on social justice and cultural issues, at the detriment of traditional academic subjects. The regulation of firearms would become stringent, with private ownership potentially facing severe restrictions, governmental registration and intense control/scrutiny. Participation in government-provided healthcare would be mandatory, with private healthcare options being eliminated. Religious institutions would face stringent licensing requirements, taxation, and government monitoring to prevent anti-government rhetoric.

Under this regime, economic incentives might be diminished as efforts and earnings are redistributed, potentially leading to decreased motivation among individuals. The Constitution would be subject to extensive reinterpretation to restrict personal freedoms, transforming it from a protector of rights into a tool for governmental control. The military would be under the command of those who are most supportive of the government’s agenda, with any resistance to social justice initiatives being met with immediate dismissal.

American Civil War Conclusion

There is not much in our country’s current situation where the Right is succeeding in instituting their ideals. If nothing is done to stop this course of developments, the nation may indeed be evolve (devolve?) towards a state where the ideological battle is resolved without the need for an actual armed conflict. The Civil War may be won without a shot even being fired.

However should one occur, knowing the outcomes that I have stated above is close to the truth, which ideology would you prefer to live under?